Showing posts with label Drugs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Drugs. Show all posts

Cancer Drugs Affected By Ongoing Shortages

After we wrote about the ongoing problem of drug shortages, we heard from one of our readers.


“I start chemotherapy tomorrow and was to take adriamycin (generic doxorubicin),” she begins. But:



My oncologist called today to say there is a shortage so I have to have an alternative … I have enough stress right now with the diagnosis of breast cancer, surgery recovery and now this. What is the real answer to this shortage? I am told cancer patients all over the country are being told the same.


Indeed, several chemotherapy drugs are among those most in demand, Cynthia Reilly, director of the practice development division at the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, tells the Health Blog. The group keeps a list of all medications and vaccines in short supply; it now numbers more than 140. (When the WSJ wrote about shortages in 2002, the list stood at 40.) The FDA has its own list, but it’s shorter than ASHP’s because it tracks only drugs deemed medically necessary.


Drug shortages occur for a range of reasons that vary by medication: the unavailability of raw ingredients, FDA enforcement actions that halt production, voluntary recalls, poor inventory ordering, a change in product formulation and even rumors of an impending shortage, which can cause hoarding, according to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. When drugs are made only by a few suppliers, any one manufacturer can have a huge impact, Michael Link, president-elect of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, tells the Health Blog.


According to the ASHP’s entry on doxorubicin products, one producer reported an unexpected increase in demand, another suffered manufacturing issues and a third didn’t offer a reason.


Vincristine, used to treat leukemia and pediatric cancers, among others, has also been affected by increased demand and manufacturing problems, according to ASHP. One maker of etoposide, for testicular cancer and small-cell lung cancer, was beset by manufacturing delays, while others couldn’t provide an explanation, ASHP says. And cisplatin, which Link says is very important for use against testicular cancer, is also on the ASHP’s list.


“These are drugs that have become mainstays of curative therapy” for both pediatric and adult cancers, Link says. And for many of them, there are no good workarounds or alternatives — randomized trials have shown them to improve outcomes when added to standard treatment, he says. “When we’re forced to treat patients without that drug, we know we are giving suboptimal treatment,” he says. “And it’s adding stress at a time when [patients] can ill afford it.”


Link and Reilly were among the attendees at a drug shortages summit convened earlier this month by their organizations, the ISMP and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Manufacturers and representatives of regulatory agencies also attended. In addition to establishing working groups to study longer-term solutions to the problem, the group explored some short-term measures, including pushing back expiration dates when they are arbitrary, Link says.


Image: iStockphoto


View the original article here

‘Love & Other Drugs’: Viagra Sales Rep as Romantic Lead?

Thanksgiving weekend is a big moviegoing opportunity, with at least one film that aims to please families, from Grandpa down to toddlers.


Unless you are 17 or older and also feel comfortable viewing many instances of onscreen nudity while sharing Milk Duds with blood relatives, “Love & Other Drugs” is not that movie.


The film is of interest to the Health Blog, though, because the male lead, played by Jake Gyllenhaal, is a Pfizer sales rep, responsible for persuading doctors to switch to Zoloft from Prozac and eventually, to sell them on the then-revolutionary Viagra. (The movie’s action begins in 1996.)


Gyllenhaal’s character also meets a patient (played by Anne Hathaway) on the job and ends up romancing her — quite explicitly, according to the reviews we read this morning, which were mixed. (Here are links to reviews from New York Magazine, the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and RottenTomatoes.com’s amalgamation of reviews.)


The way he first encounters Hathaway’s character, by pretending to be an intern so he can see her with her shirt off, as well as other instances of untoward sales practices and conduct, isn’t pleasing Pfizer so much. As the WSJ reported last month, a spokesman for the drug giant said that based on the trailer alone, “we do not condone the sales practices portrayed.” He continued: “They do not conform to our policies and procedures, which hold our employees to high ethical standards.”


Yesterday, Pfizer released a statement reminding viewers the company was not involved in the film’s production. And — spoiler alert! — the company said it was “glad to see appropriate attention paid to the complex challenges facing Parkinson’s disease patients and their families,” noting that Pfizer scientists are among those seeking a cure and improved therapies for that and other neurodegenerative diseases.


The movie’s director, Ed Zwick, told the WSJ that he consulted with physicians and pharma reps to “get the details right,” including instances of reps discussing how to promote off-label use of drugs. Pfizer, of course, paid $2.3 billion last year to settle allegations of improper marketing of its painkiller Bextra, which is no longer on the market, and other open investigations.


If this pharma-industry-as-movie-backdrop thing works out, we can suggest Zwick’s next project: a biopic based on the sales rep who blew the whistle on both AstraZeneca and Eli Lilly, getting a chunk of the companies’ multi-million dollar settlements with the government.


(We should note that both the WSJ and 20th Century Fox, which is releasing the film, are owned by News Corp.)


Update: This post has been updated with a statement from Pfizer.


Photo: 20th Century Fox


View the original article here